March 3, 2013

Evolution of Aesthetic: Knowledge

From: Art's The Answer!
Stagnation is the surest path to death, either of our minds or our spirits. To nurture our intellect, we must continue to consider new ideas from books read or discussions had. However, nurturing our aesthetic can take many roads. The most accessible way is  a regular attendance of new galleries or exhibits to keep the flame of creativity and inspiration burning. It may just be my love of books, but I find the more I learn about the world, the more beautiful it becomes.

St. John the Baptist, Jusepe de Ribera c. 1624
Usually, paintings such as the two found above bore me completely. Being neither religious nor a historian of art, these don't speak to me in the slightest. However, after reading Theresa Cheek's excellent post on the excessive use of the angle 23.5 degrees, these religious pictures became more interesting. (I  highly recommend reading the original post and her blog Art's The Answer!: 23.5)

From Science Blogs, Starts with a BANG
The earth is titled at a 23.5 degree angle from a perpendicular access to the ecliptic. The Ecliptic is the perceived path that the sun and the planets follow through the earths sky. In the Ptolemaic days, people thought that it was the sun's path that was tilted in regards to the earth, but later Astronomy proved that it was the earth that was tilted instead. This tilt is responsible for the different seasons of the year.


As Ms. Cheek illustrates, early painters were well aware of this angle and considered it divine. They hid this angle in a number of different places in their paintings- from the subtle as in the picture above to the more obvious pointing of the arms in the early pictures. These paintings are full of mathematical and astronomical symbolism which makes them far more interesting than I ever gave them credit for. Read her article or look up some more examples to see for yourself.

I still don't care for these early paintings, but after learning how to see the angle of the ecliptic they are more palatable than before. My aesthetic has increased slightly from this knowledge.

If this interested you, look at Paradigmshift for tons more examples.

What have you done to evolve your aesthetic?

February 27, 2013

An Argument for Aesthetics I: Certainty

Aristotelian Logic Square

Reason leaves me cold.

This fact terrifies me. I want to be able to reason from first principles, but when I look at a set- any set- of first principles my mind  goes blank. The words slide over my thoughts like water on oil- finding no foothold in my mind much less in my gut. Rattle off ten different first principles and I couldn't say which I believed and whether those were true or not.

It is only when those first principles are built upon into real world examples that they evoke some reaction. When I can see how human's interactions and characters change because of these held first principles, then I understand why these first principles matter.

But this judgement of action doesn't rely on reason. If I see a heroic man, I know he is heroic without knowing that one of his first principles is 'life is worth living." This knowledge has very little to do with reason and very much to do with the principle of Aesthetics as I understand it.

Listening to a piece of music, your gut tells you right away not only if it is good or bad, but how strongly you value it. Looking at a painting, do you need to measure out the composition and compare the colors to see if you like it?  No. These things are known intuitively and without reason leading towards them. We may indulge our narrative fallacy and fill in logical reasons for why we feel this way, but this feeling comes first. This feeling is what I call our aesthetic: what we find to be beautiful and good.

Like our reasoning, our aesthetic may be swayed by others opinions. Try coming out of a movie with friends and not having your judgement swayed by a friend who thought differently about the film than you. It may become diluted with too much influence- else why are our closets so eclectic. Finally, our aesthetic may evolve- as people moving away from subcultures prove.

What aesthetics offers is a certainty reason fails. Logic is only a tool as good and useful as the first principles it builds upon. If those first principles can not be judged to be correct or incorrect, all the logic in the world doesn't help. But I know whether I find a piece of music beautiful or grating, a dress inspired or ridiculous. I am far more certain of my aesthetic judgement than my philosophical. And that certainty is very reassuring.

February 12, 2013

The Kawaii Ganger Guide


Today, Katherine at Sun is in our Hands posted a wonderful interview between an Anthropologist and two members of alternative fashion 'gangs.'  In addition to being very well spoken, one of the girls, Charlotte, made a very clear connection between your attitude and your aesthetic. Fashion decisions can be just as revolutionary and rebellious as any protests. They take just as much courage and may even require greater dedication.

Read the article and let me know what you think.




January 5, 2013

There Are Two Views of the World:

Just as there are only ever two types of people, there are two ways to view on the world: by focusing on the things in themselves and by focusing on the relationships between those things. Continuing the metaphor, just as there are always limitations with any dividing duality, there are inherent problems with focusing exclusively on either the things in themselves or the relationships between things.

It is easy to focus on objects in themselves because it is easy for our eye to distinguish objects from each other. That Bible is clearly different than the other books on your bookshelf or the wood of the bookshelf itself. A friend can be picked out of a crowd of other people with ease. Normally, we focus on the objects by themselves.  This can be as simple as staring at the Bible on a bookshelf or focusing solely on the scowl on a friend's face. Much can be learned by focusing on just this thing. For instance, you can understand how angry your friend is, how long the anger might last, if the anger is directed at you, just by examining the movements of your friend as she stomps towards you.

Equally easily is to find the short comings of focusing on the thing itself. If you ignore the relationships and context of the item, you'll lose out on much of its meaning. For instance, a Bible alone on a shelf alone is very different than a Bible on a shelf with the Quran, Tao Te Ching, and the Book of Mormon. Your friend stomping towards you angrily is different than your friend stomping away from their arch nemesis angrily and very different from them stomping away from their beloved angrily.

The faults of the first system gives rise to the strengths of the second. By focusing on the relationships between things a greater subtly and understanding of the world can be understood. By seeing where things stand in relation to other, you have a better sense of the thing itself in how and why it is being used. Focusing on the things themselves answers what and who questions. Focusing on relationships between things answers how and why questions.

But, outside of the laws of physics, the relationships between things are inherently subjective. We might think that the Bible belongs among all the other books on Religion and Philosophy and miss that its normal resting place is beside the bed. Or, and I suspect this happens often in offices, we become so focused on interpersonal power plays that we miss the chance to do something meaningful and good in the world.

To sum it up: the world is like a spiderweb. Individual objects are the junctions between the strands. Relationships are the strands going from node to node. But nodes are made up of strands and strands must connect node to node. Focusing on either one of these means the entire spiderweb is lost and, therefore, we lose sight of reality. Since Neo-Aristocrats live and succeed only in reality, we must train ourselves to not be caught up focusing too intently on either the things in themselves or the relationships between things.

December 28, 2012

End of the Year Review


Based on the past two years, my blog appears cyclical in nature- raising its head for the first months of the school year and dying down again after Christmas. By posting this end of the year review, I will break that spell and continue to post throughout the spring and summer of 2013- the year the world didn't end.

In 2011, I focused on defining and setting out what I liked and disliked about each of the three inspirations for my own aesthetic with the intention of putting those into practice for the rest of the year. This discussion helped solidify why I liked somethings, but didn't lead to much practical application.

2012 was a year of transition. In addition to changing the appearance and name of the blog, I have begun to shift focus from reviewing different aesthetics. There were a few practical applications, another test argument, and some more general posts. Not a unified year. It is a pity, because I have pages and pages of half written blog ideas both on the computer and in my notebooks that I never got around to writing.

Based on the directions of my thoughts and the posts I have written already, 2013 will focus on more philosophical thoughts and more day to day 'how-to's' as I attempt to answer the question of 'what do I like' from the metaphysical and the practical standpoints. Hopefully the two shall meet somewhere in the middle.

In conclusion, while I'm glad this blog didn't die in 2012, I wasn't pleased with the quantity or type of posts. My goals for 2013 are to write 50 posts for this new year and stick to my newly defined goal of this blog.

If you are a blogger, what are your goals for 2013 in your blog? If not, what are your goals for the new year in your life?

Have a Happy New Year!

November 28, 2012

An Allegory for Rebels

"Lost" by Alecu Grigore
http://photo.net/photodb/folder?folder_id=783569
If our society were like a decaying mansion, what then?

Kibble clutters corners. The stinking water stains eek over rotting plaster while the click of rodent nails echo in the walls. Few panes of glass remain in the windows. The house is decaying. Failing. Rotting from the center out. The occupants recognize this fact but shrug their shoulders or raise their eyes to an uncaring God.

There are some inhabitants who do not conform to apathy. They stalk the forgotten wings of the sprawling mansion, learn the secret passwords to skulk in the basement, identify the weaknesses and ready their attack. Together they plot- drawn together tighter by a hatred of the crumbling house above them than by any creative pursuit. Or rather, destruction is their creation. They whisper fervently about disturbing the sheep and cattle who live above, opening their eyes and leading them from their prison. They speak of the glory of chaos and beauty of anarchy. Fire and blood haunt their dreams.

But what if they succeed?

What if the bombs are placed on the weakened supports? What if the fuses are ignited  What if their dream is realized?

The house explodes. Violently. Passionately. Dust and debris rain down as the flames consume the life we once lived. Ecstatic at the change, we dance before the inferno and believe ourselves to be freed.

But the fire burns out. Dawn comes. We realize what is outside of the house is not the Eden promised, but a world even more drab and crumbling than the house we left. Plus, our winter coats were burned in the fire.

No longer tied together by a common enemy, the inhabitants begin to fight among themselves to establish some sort of shelter. Worse, they band together to destroy an overlooked, but structurally sound shed on the edge of the yard. Their need for companionship that comes from shared hatred turns their focus to individuals or institutions no deserving of such attack.

What have their plots gained them? At least the home was familiar. At least it kept the worst of the rain from our heads. At least it gave us a common complaint. We could always look out the cracked windows and imagine ourselves leaving. Perhaps we even did.

No. I do not want to see our house reduced to rubble and dust. Not unless there is an architect with crisp blueprints that solve, in clear mathematics, the structural problems of our past home. Not unless there is an army of builders who will not cut corners to line their own pockets.

Until then, I will wander my house like a specter  hands clasped at the small of my back. I will neither pretend to ignore the decay nor will I aid in its destruction of the house. I will not pretend the windows are whole and clear, but neither shall a rock leave my hand to shatter the sharp panes. Instead, I will clean what panes I can so others may see the world outside more clearly. I will not step over the discarded chair, but nor will I kick it to pieces for the petty superiority of watching something break. Instead, I will right it, dust it off, be on my way. Better yet, in my own corner of the house, I will gather together supplies and build myself a book shelf or writing desk.

Destruction is easy. There are so many ways to break things. It is much harder to create.

November 27, 2012

A Fond Farewell

Angle of Death Victorious
http://www.tumblr.com/tagged/angels?before=1339651469

On November 20th 2012, the world for all those who love alternative fashions and lifestyles suffered a loss. Miss Lumpy of the wonderful blog "Her Lumpiness" hung up her hat and bid adieu to the Lolita lifestyle. In a beautiful final post, she made her farewells, explained her reasoning and introduced us to her new blog.

Her decision to move on has my complete support and understanding. But since this blog was so important to my own developing interest in alternative Aesthetics, I want to take a moment to reflect on her work.

Miss Lumpy's writing on the Lolita lifestyle is some of the best I have ever seen. This blog was inspired by her own. In addition to covering the basics of Lolita fashion, she explained how she was applying Lolita to her daily lifestyle as well: book recommendations  etsy shop reviews, daily outfit posts. But what set her blog apart is her willingness to tackle some of the deeper and more painful topics. Her posts covered the gambit from relationship abuse to bullying to self esteem. I follow a lot of blogs for alternative fashion, but Miss Lumpy's was the only one that covered such a range of ideas. She blended the profound and the beautiful together seamlessly. 
   
I will miss her posts. Her writing was clear and nuanced. Her topics inspired me to find beauty in my day to day life despite being from a different aesthetic. Her presence will be missed in my RSS feeds.

However, her goodbye to the lolita aesthetic brings up another interesting idea: we evolve. The ideas we held sacred seven years ago may have no relevance to our current life. As new ideas and information enter our minds, as new experiences shape our memories, it is a greater crime to cling to the past and stagnate rather than embrace the change. There should be no shame in putting old, fond ideas to rest if it means clearing your life for a new  inspiration. 

But, as Chinese Medicine teaches, grief accompanies every change in life- even the changes for the good. Miss Lumpy will be missed, but I look forward to reading Ally Button's new work.